Skip to main content

Trailer Reviews: Fifty Shades of Grey

Holy crap, Lars von Trier added another volume to Nymphomaniac! Yes! - Charlotte Gainsborough is back as Joe, the unrepentant nymphomaniac who's appetite for sex returns...with a vengeance! I can't wait to see how von Trier outdoes himself with pretentious and artful mundane things like fly fishing and the Fibernache sequence will be used as a metaphor for Joe and her numerous partners...



Oh wait, it's just the anticipated first look at the erotic drama Fifty Shades of Grey (due out in theaters February 13, 2015). Nevermind.

First off, I have never read the original source material by E.L. James. The premise - a young girl and a mysterious entrepreneur falling in love, but quickly realizing his past is much darker than previously imagined, including a thing for bondage and dom-submissive fetishes - feels something ripped from a cheesy erotic romantic novel that didn't sell with readers until present day. That, and I have a little something called Cinemax After Dark. Nevertheless, the erotic drama is something that hasn't really resurfaced in quite sometime. Sure, there were movies like Shame and the previously mentioned Nymphomaniac, but those movies were less erotic and more unsettling to watch. The former is a brutal and frank look at a man's self-destructive path toward the abyss because of his addiction to sexual gratification, and the latter is a provocative commentary on female sexuality and gender politics on sex - hardly titillating for audience consumption. So I guess we should welcome what promises to be a steamy, sexually-charged drama featuring two attractive leads in Dakota Johnson as Amanda Steele (no offense, but jeez, that sounds like the stage name of a porn star!) and James Dornan as Christian Grey. I mean, there's not much wrong with the trailer, to be honest: the cinematography looks lush and lovely give the dark color palette it flaunts; the acting has an air of mystery behind it, especially with Dornan's Grey; and Beyonce's hit song, "Crazy In Love" takes on a more sinister tone, in contrast to the song's upbeat, energetic tune.

The problem is that the trailer itself isn't really all that steamy, or erotic. Universal Pictures and their indie outfit, Focus Features, have bragged about this being dark and sensual, but the trailer misses out on the sensual/erotic portion of it. Sure, there's fast cuts of Amanda being tied up and moaning in pure pleasure over this new sexual experience, but we don't feel the heat radiating off the screen. The purpose of something like this is to turn the audience on; to get us hot and bothered, to feel the scorching passion between the two lovers, and you'd think the trailer would give said audience a taste of what is to come before the big, um...release (no pun intended). The trailer to Fifty Shades of Grey fails on that effort.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cowardice

I was looking forward to watching the James Franco/Seth Rogen comedy The Interview  on Christmas Day, even more so than Angelina Jolie's WWII drama Unbroken , or Rob Marshall's Into the Woods . I like what the writing and directing duo of Rogen and his pal Evan Goldberg have done with comedies like Superbad , Pineapple Express and their debut feature, This Is the End . In light of Sony being hacked (which now appears to be North Korea's doing) and threats of attacking theaters that carry the comedy, three things happened today: 1.) Every major theater chain - AMC, Regal, Cinemark, Arclight, etc, had decided to pull out from showing The Interview  on its scheduled release date. 2.)  This prompted Sony Pictures to basically cancel the release date of the film amid threats of blowing up theaters. 3.)  Both Sony and the theater chains basically caved into the demands of cyber terrorism from North Korea. Are you fucking kidding me? We just caved into terrorist d

On Dynasties, Ignorance, and Moving Foreward To the Future.

In the beginning, I wanted Mr. Brown Verses to be a blog about movies, and that's it. Given how there's much more going on, like film analysis and how it relates to issues both here in America and beyond our borders; the annual predictions on the Academy Awards race; the state of the film industry; issues of ethnicity and gender roles in the business; the continued rise of fandom with both sexes; etc - it would be foolish to not  talk about it and just sticking with reviewing movies. Most of this has been hesitance on my end because I personally feel that I'm not as well-versed in the film medium to really speak on trends and whatnot. There are other, more eloquent critics and readers of the Award-season tea leaves that express these concepts so damn well, it's almost amazing they haven't been picked up by publishers like Entertainment Weekly or Rolling Stone or The New York Times, but I guess the idea that they stand apart makes their work more fearless, more rich

Mr. Brown Verses Battleship (Or: Michael Bay's Poisonous Influence On Modern Day Action/Blockbuster Movies)

Eventually, I am going to get to reviewing a movie that I actually liked, because I don't just want to be be bitching about terrible movies from the past and from the present In fact, there are two really great movies i'll be reviewing within the next week ( The Perks of Being a Wallflower and The Master ) that I think rank among the year's best; add to that the release of Ben Affleck's international thriller Argo , and you'll be seeing a weekend's worth of praise of movies from me, including my picks for the best movies i've seen thusfar. Now, before I tear into the latest review on the sci-fi action picture, Battleship , I need to give this movie some background; not as much on the board game that inspired this bloated and boring piece of crap, mind you, but rather, the director who's trademarks are all over this mess of a film: Michael Bay. See, back in 1998, Bay released a little movie that joined together an unholy union of the Dirty Dozen, the