Skip to main content

Mr. Brown Verses Irritating Teen Bullshit

LOL is shit. Just absolute, moronic, irritating shit.

I talked about this movie in January back when I was reviewing my 10 worst list, but I really haven't gone into full detail about why this piece of shit landed the no.3 spot on my list of the most infuriatingly bad movies of the past year. By the way, you are reading the title correctly, that's the name of the movie. I fear that LMFAO, OMG!, and WTF?! aren't that far behind, as it goes to naming movies. It isn't just the name that I think is a lazy name for a movie title, it's everything else about this shallow, vacuous, obnoxious and pretentious coming of age teen drama that managed to piss me off, but i'm getting a bit ahead of myself.

Before I talk about this movie, I have to mention that LOL (God, that's annoying to say) is actually a remake of the 2008 French comedy called....LOL (Laughing Out Loud). I don't know anything else about that movie, but on IMDB, the film holds a fairly decent user rating of 6.1 percent, and that the French teen comedy was well-received in it's native country. As you might expect, Hollywood saw the success and decided to put their own spin on the film for an American audience. And who better than to get teenage girls and their mothers into the theater than Hanna Montana herself, Miley Cyrus, star in the movie as the title character, Lola!

I'm not actually sure why they went with Cyrus for the title role, actually: she's not a particularly good actress, and as the returns on The Last Song proved, she doesn't have the star power to draw in a big audience outside of her success from Hanna Montana. Sure, there was the Disney animated film Bolt, but that was an animated feature which generally score well at the box office, it was released during the holidays in 2008, and Cyrus had more in a supporting role, as we only really heard her for about 30 minutes throughout the whole movie. As for the rest of the movie? Well, let me start by saying that Cyrus's character, Lola, or has her friends call her LOL for short (Get it? Her nickname is LOL, like the text language the kids are using these days and like the title of the film; its so fucking clever...) has problems.

See, despite her upper-middle class lifestyle, the fact she, her little sis, and her mother, Anne (Demi Moore) live in a fancy apartment complex in the middle of Chicago; despite the fact her mother drives her around in a highly expensive luxury SUV; and despite the fact she has friends that are just shallow and obnoxious as she is, she's still has issues. For one thing, she just found out that her mega-cute boyfriend, Chad (of course his name is Chad; almost every pretty boy in a teen movie is named Chad, Jake, Ryan, etc.) cheated on her during summer vacation, right after they cemented their love in the school's bathroom, saying Chad + Lola forever, with a heart surrounding their names. For another, now she starts developing feelings for her friend, Kyle, who looks like a missing member of Crash and the Boys. Add to it, her nosey, overprotective mother, Anne (Demi Moore), who's worried that Lola maybe hiding secrets from her and doing drugs and all that jazz (which, ironically enough, Anne and her gal pals are also smoking weed and having random hookups with her ex-hubby, played by Thomas Jane, who looks really ashamed of himself to be involved in this dungheap).

Lola isn't the only person who has drama in her life. Her BFF Ashley is hot for teacher, a trigonometric instructor who, once again, looks like a really good looking model rather than a high school teacher, but wants to gain experience before she does this with her dream guy, so she bangs the cliched perv-o who doesn't realize how much of a tool he looks like, in the bathroom stall. Lola's new crush, Kyle, is the lead singer in a band, and their lead guitarist just so happens to be Lola's ex, Chad. To add even more drama, Kyle's father is the stereotypical dickhead father, who wants his son to quit being in his band and smoking weed, grow up, get better grades and make a name for himself like he did.


Why yes, what I just described over the last two paragraphs is just one big pile of plot points and subplots that collide into one another in repetitive fashion throughout the film's 97 minutes, resulting in scenes that just drag on and on without any regard for pacing, but that's the least of the film's problems. The most glaring issue with LOL is that these characters are just not developed. There's no personality or any real traits these kids have besides being young, Caucasian and privileged. And speaking of: these obnoxious, spiteful, nasty little shits annoyed the living hell out of me, Lola in particular! Take the moment where her mother lets her have a few friends over for a get-together.  She abuses said agreement, as a get together soon becomes a full-blown house party, complete with a trashed home, booze trash and condom wrappers littering the home floor. Here's the kicker, though: her friends lower Lola's grandmother's defenses by slipping a little something extra (read: strong liquor) in her drink, causing her to pass out. Excuse my French, but Lola's a nasty little bitch, and her "friends" are just as mean-spirited as she is. Explain to me how these characters are supposed to be relatable now?

If the script (which is basically a series of mini-lost episodes of The OC) is a misguided and insulting look at privileged, vain, and obnoxious teens passing off  their arrogance, their self-centered impulses and deeds, and their cliched plot points as depth, then it should come to the surprise of no one, that the words and dialogue is boring, pretentious fluff to add a serious tone to a film that's already a farce. Take this 'riveting' line of monologue from Lola as she explains what love must feel like: "It's so good to love someone so much it hurts. I don't know how people survive this. Honestly, I don't." Yawn. Hell, even the band sucks, playing a song that's supposed to be a deep, meaningful love song, but it comes off as generic and uninspired.

It would be one thing if LOL was a satire on the shallow teen culture that film studios and television networks shove down our throats, but this movie confuses its vain and shallow characters as misunderstood, rebellious youth in the age of social networking, texting and the Internet. This attempt only shows that the filmmakers either don't understand youth today, or that's how their audience wants and expects them to see them as. Either way, it's deep down phony bullshit..

Zero stars out of ****

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cowardice

I was looking forward to watching the James Franco/Seth Rogen comedy The Interview  on Christmas Day, even more so than Angelina Jolie's WWII drama Unbroken , or Rob Marshall's Into the Woods . I like what the writing and directing duo of Rogen and his pal Evan Goldberg have done with comedies like Superbad , Pineapple Express and their debut feature, This Is the End . In light of Sony being hacked (which now appears to be North Korea's doing) and threats of attacking theaters that carry the comedy, three things happened today: 1.) Every major theater chain - AMC, Regal, Cinemark, Arclight, etc, had decided to pull out from showing The Interview  on its scheduled release date. 2.)  This prompted Sony Pictures to basically cancel the release date of the film amid threats of blowing up theaters. 3.)  Both Sony and the theater chains basically caved into the demands of cyber terrorism from North Korea. Are you fucking kidding me? We just caved into terrorist d

On Dynasties, Ignorance, and Moving Foreward To the Future.

In the beginning, I wanted Mr. Brown Verses to be a blog about movies, and that's it. Given how there's much more going on, like film analysis and how it relates to issues both here in America and beyond our borders; the annual predictions on the Academy Awards race; the state of the film industry; issues of ethnicity and gender roles in the business; the continued rise of fandom with both sexes; etc - it would be foolish to not  talk about it and just sticking with reviewing movies. Most of this has been hesitance on my end because I personally feel that I'm not as well-versed in the film medium to really speak on trends and whatnot. There are other, more eloquent critics and readers of the Award-season tea leaves that express these concepts so damn well, it's almost amazing they haven't been picked up by publishers like Entertainment Weekly or Rolling Stone or The New York Times, but I guess the idea that they stand apart makes their work more fearless, more rich

Mr. Brown Verses Battleship (Or: Michael Bay's Poisonous Influence On Modern Day Action/Blockbuster Movies)

Eventually, I am going to get to reviewing a movie that I actually liked, because I don't just want to be be bitching about terrible movies from the past and from the present In fact, there are two really great movies i'll be reviewing within the next week ( The Perks of Being a Wallflower and The Master ) that I think rank among the year's best; add to that the release of Ben Affleck's international thriller Argo , and you'll be seeing a weekend's worth of praise of movies from me, including my picks for the best movies i've seen thusfar. Now, before I tear into the latest review on the sci-fi action picture, Battleship , I need to give this movie some background; not as much on the board game that inspired this bloated and boring piece of crap, mind you, but rather, the director who's trademarks are all over this mess of a film: Michael Bay. See, back in 1998, Bay released a little movie that joined together an unholy union of the Dirty Dozen, the